Archive for the ‘Lincoln the President’ Category

17
Aug

The Importance of the Emancipation Proclamation

   Posted by: Various Authors

Kenny Leones asked:




Why was the emancipation proclamation written? This document was written many years ago. Abraham Lincoln issued this in the 1860s. Many historians pointed out many reasons why it was needed to be written.

1. The first answer to the question why was the emancipation proclamation written is to have something that can have a crippling effect on the effort of the Southern states during the war. This was one of the main reasons. Those who had written it wanted to lessen the edge of the Southern troops in the ongoing war back then. The Lincoln troops were lesser than the soldiers in the South.

2. The second answer to the question why was the speech written is because the slaves had a major role in the war. They were the people responsible for readying the soldiers’ uniforms and ammunition. They also were the ones who rebuilt the infrastructures that got damaged because of the war. Most of the staffs of hospitals back then were slaves as well. The Emancipation proclamation would mean that it would leave the Southern force with lesser people to help them.

3. The third answer to the question why was the emancipation proclamation written is to gain support from other countries. One of the reasons for drafting this important document is for a political reason. Most of the European countries supported the Southern force because of their goal to gain independence. The United Kingdom also supported them because the relationship between the American government and United Kingdom got a strain because of the Trent event. Abraham Lincoln wanted to still keep the union intact. The Emancipation proclamation was something many European countries respected because they also believed that no man should be a slave to anyone. They were not able to ignore this humane and fair decree.

4. The fourth answer to the question why was the speech written is to give slaves their freedom. President Abraham Lincoln was always vocal of his negative views on slavery even years before the emancipation was proclaimed. He already drafted a document aiming to end slavery in all the states but this was not pushed through because many states did not cooperate. This is the most important answer to the question, why was the emancipation proclamation written.

5. The fifth answer to the question why was the emancipation proclamation written is for the slaves to get fully assimilated to the society. The emancipation document became the first and most important step in providing the legal rights to the slaves.

Create a video blog
 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , ,

Jonathan R. Allen asked:




During Abraham Lincoln’s 1864 run for a second term as president, Andrew Johnson (1808-1875) was his vice-presidential running mate. At this time during the Civil War, Lincoln was an unpopular president and Andrew Johnson, a southern War Democrat and Governor of Tennessee, would give the Republican ticket broader appeal to the important border states. On the Democrat ticket opposing Lincoln and Johnson in the 1864 election were George B. McClellan (the former Union general) and his running mate, George Hunt Pendleton. Abraham Lincoln won the election, but it was not a landslide victory. Lincoln won 55 percent of the total popular vote to McClellan’s 45 percent. Following President Abraham Lincoln’s assassination, Johnson took the oath of office as president on April 15, 1865.

Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural on March 4, 1865 was held on a miserable, windy, rainy, and muddy day in Washington, D.C. The inaugural ceremonies were planned to be held outside, but were moved inside to the Senate chamber because the weather was so bad. Vice President Hannibal Hamlin was retiring, and Tennessee Democrat Andrew Johnson would now be inaugurated as Abraham Lincoln’s vice-president. The Senate chamber’s 1800s ventilation system was poor and it could not handle the added moisture from the wet and soaked clothes of the people attending the ceremony. The Senate chamber was muggy and sticky, it was a very uncomfortable place to be on this poor-weather inaugural day in Washington, D.C.

Andrew Johnson had been suffering from typhoid fever and generally was in poor health, during the weeks before the inaugural. Johnson’s travel to Washington, D.C. from Nashville did not help his physical condition, and he didn’t feel well shortly before the inauguration. He downed three glasses of “medicinal” whiskey before entering the uncomfortable Senate chamber. As Andrew Johnson walked into the Senate chamber he appeared to be unsteady, and he was leaning on Hannibal Hamlin’s arm.

Usually the vice-president’s inaugural speech is a brief formality on inauguration day. It became obvious to all that the new vice-president was three sheets to the wind as he began his vice-presidential inauguration speech. The stewed Johnson rambled on and on, speaking for seventeen minutes instead of the expected seven. Hannibal Hamlin finally gave a tug on Johnson’s coat-tail, and only then did Johnson end his alcohol-impaired inaugural speech.

Andrew Johnson’s sottish inauguration festivities and formalities were not yet complete. As he took the oath of office (which took more time than needed because Johnson drunkenly rambled with incoherent and slurred speech), Johnson put his hand on the Bible and said in a loud voice; “I kiss this Book in the face of my nation the United States.”

Johnson then gave the Bible a tipsy kiss. As the now freshly inaugurated vice-president, it was Johnson’s job to swear-in the new senators. Vice President Andrew Johnson was too drunk and confused for this, so instead a Senate clerk performed swearing-in of the new senators.

After the drunken Andrew Johnson had been inaugurated indoors as vice-president, the nasty weather began to clear and improve. Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address could now be given outside as was originally planned. As Lincoln witnessed the soused Andrew Johnson’s Bible kiss, he said to Senator John B. Henderson, who was the marshal for the inauguration; “Do not let Johnson speak outside.”

Later, President Lincoln remarked regarding Vice President Johnson’s inaugural drunkenness;

“It has been a severe lesson for Andy, but I do not think he will do it again.”

Lincoln had known Johnson for years and they were friends. To answer concerns expressed by some about Johnson, Lincoln further explained;

“I have known Andrew Johnson for many years. He made a slip the other day, but you need not be scared; Andy ain’t a drunkard.”

“The inauguration went off very well except that the Vice President Elect was too drunk to perform his duties & disgraced himself & the Senate by making a drunken foolish speech. I was never so mortified in my life, had I been able to find a hole I would have dropped through it out of sight.”

- Senator Zachariah Chandler.

Caffeinated Content
 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , ,

30
Apr

A public offer to kill President Lincoln & others

   Posted by: B. Nash

A Million Dollar offer of assassination on Lincoln?

A Million Dollar offer of assassination on Lincoln?

From “The Lincoln Herald” Volume III, Number 4, Winter 2009
 
 
Paul N. Herbert had written in the Washington Times (May 7, 2009) about an assassination offer by one George Washington Gayle in December 1864. He was a Democratic State legislator and U. S. attorney for the Southern District of Alabama who placed an ad in the Selma Dispatch as follows:
“ONE MILLION DOLLARS WANTED TO HAVE PEACE BY THE FIRST OF MARCH.”
 
“If the citizens of the Southern Confederacy will furnish me with the cash, or good securities for the sum of $1,000,000, I will cause the lives of Abraham Lincoln, William H. Seward, and Andrew Johnson to be taken by the 1st of March next. This will give us peace, and satisfy the world that cruel tyrants cannot live in a ‘land of liberty.’ If this is not accomplished, nothing will be claimed beyond the sum of $50,000 in advance, which is supposed necessary to reach and slaughter the three villians. I will give, myself, $1,000 towards this patriotic purpose. Everyone wishing to contribute will address Box X, Cahawba, Ala.”
This assassination offer had no known connection to John Wilkes Booth. Gayle was eventually arrested on conspiracy charges and giving aid to the rebellion. He was imprisioned at Ft. Pulaski in Georgia. President Andrew Johnson pardoned him on April 27, 1867.
It seems strange to me that someone who via a public means threatened to kill the President of the United States and other elected high officials would be pardoned at all-much less than 3 years after the threat was made. I don’t know if President Johnson received an outcry for the pardon or not. Perhaps you just had to be there to understand it?
 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: ,

20
Mar

President Lincoln: Grace Under Pressure

   Posted by: B. Nash

Bust of President Lincoln, Springfield, Ill.

Bust of President Lincoln, Springfield, Ill.

One of the exhibits in the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Museum and Library in Springfield is the “Whispering Gallery.”  The online description of the gallery states that it is a “twisted, nightmarish hallway where you can hear brutally unkind things said about Mr. and Mrs. Lincoln during their early months in Washington. On the walls are cruel caricatures and barbed political cartoons that attack the Lincolns.” I remember walking through the gallery for the first time. My ears were filled with multitudes of various people voicing-and sometimes shouting- their opinions about Lincoln or something he had done or was about to do. I realized in a more sure way how those voices were constantly being offered to Lincoln- and were often counter with others. When I arrived at the end of the gallery-there was Lincoln. He was standing in a position of contemplation while all the different voices swiled around him.   Then I thought: “Lincoln couldn’t win no matter what he did-if he had listened solely to the rantings of all those who knew “what was best” in his choices.” It took a very special individual to deal with all those opinions, demands, and unsolicited offerings that he had been exposed to daily while President. Yet, he forged his own way. He made the decisions he thought were best-often after careful deliberation weighing the various viewpoints. And he did so in a way that I describe as “grace under pressure.”
President Lincoln had a mountain of problems to deal with. Even as he was heading to Washington, the nation was splitting. War was just around the corner. For all practical purposes, the South didn’t support him. He wasn’t even on the ballots in the South for the Presidential election. He had death threats almost immediately. He also had “enemies” in his own cabinet. His problems were immense. Think of all the problems he had with his Generals. Think of all the Union defeats-all the casaulties-the broken homes-the BLOOD. He carried all this and more on his shoulders. Oh, he had his moments of depression. Scholars, have noted, however, that as President he kept the outward signs of depression under control. He didn’t have any suicidal episodes that are known during his terms of office. He even experienced the death of a son in the White House. Yet, he functioned amazingly well for all the stress he had-displaying grace under pressure.
Ernest Hemingway defined “guts” as grace under pressure. Certainly Lincoln had “guts.” Hemingway also defined “courage” that way. Obviously, grace under pressure describes a person who preserves a calmness and civility while going through great stress. Answers.com gives the following example of grace under pressure: “Say you’re working as the boss of a team and you’ve got a deadline to meet, grace under pressure means you don’t stomp around the office yelling at people, pulling your hair out, sweating and generally going crazy.” Well said, I think.
How did Lincoln do it? How did he handle all the stress of the office and remain so under control? I think part of the answer was his sense of humor. Lincoln really didn’t take himself too seriously. He also had a way of not taking things so seriously-when he could. It has to do with viewpoint really. He was able to somehow sort through all the “stuff” of daily life and prioritize it in a way that put it in perspective. He used humor to assist in putting things in his mind in a way he could then better “file” them in his mental filter. By applying humor to certain things, the problems became manageable. He had once commented something to the effect that if he didn’t have hunor he would die. James C. Humes gives a funny Lincoln anecdote in his book: ‘The Wit & Wisdom of Abraham Lincoln’:
“Lincoln was once called out of New Salem on an important case. He hired a horse from a livery stable. The horse turned out to be a leaden-footed nag. When Lincoln returned a few days later, he took the plodding equine back to the stable. He then asked the owner, “Keep this horse for funerals?”
 
“No indeed,” replied the outraged livery owner. “Glad to hear it,” said Lincoln, “because if you did, the corpse wouldn’t get there in time for the resurrection.”
 
 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Bob B asked:


How did President Abraham Lincoln increase the power of the Presidency? Was it a positive development?

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , ,

way2cutu asked:


I have to write a report about Abraham Lincoln. I have looked on google and wikipedia and I cannot find anything about Lincoln and states’ rights. Can you please help me? How did Lincoln feel about states’ rights?

Thank you so much!

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , ,

martha asked:


What did Abraham Lincoln mean in his second inaugural address when he stated, “”Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with, or even before, the conflict itself should cease”?

any input would help! Thanks!

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , ,

Abbey asked:


How did Abraham Lincoln interpret the Declaration of Independence as it related to African Americans? What is the significance of Lincoln’s interpretation of the Declaration of Independence for Americans today.

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , ,

magicman15k asked:


If Abraham Lincoln was the president of the United States, how was it possible that his Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves in a different country (the Confederacy)? Wouldn’t that be saying for example, the president of Canada saying all Americans have a right to shoplifting, and all of a sudden, we are allowed to steal from stores? I just don’t get how it’s possible for the President of one country to make one statement that changes the other country. Like how is that possible?

Thanks,

Eric

 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , ,

17
Jan

The Emancipation Proclamation

   Posted by: Various Authors

Steven Chabotte asked:


How does one free slaves in another country? How does one free slaves over which one has no control?

President Abraham Lincoln attempted to do just that, when he issued the two-part Emancipation Proclamation in 1862 and 1863. Criticized by Northerners, sneered at by Southerners, the Emancipation Proclamation evidenced more than anything Lincoln’s foresight and conviction that the Union would be once again be the United States of America – all states of America.

The beginnings of the Emancipation Proclamation were in the Fugitive Slave Law, enacted in 1850. The Fugitive Slave Law demanded that fugitive slaves, as property, be returned to their owners if they escaped, even if in escaping they made it to a free state. The Fugitive Slave Law became controversial as abolitionism gained ground in the North; abolitionists, flouting the law, often refused to comply and return escaped slaves to their southern owners.

While the Fugitive Slave Law caused uproar both North and South, it caused even larger problems once Civil War was declared. When Union troops encountered runaway slaves, there was no consensus as to how to treat them; while a few returned them to their owners, many considered slaves who were living in occupied areas war contraband. Others still freed the slaves, often resulting in their own dismissal.

Treating the slaves as contraband did not sit well with President Lincoln, as treating them as contraband was, in a sense, recognizing the Confederate States of America as a separate nation. Lincoln flatly refused to recognize the Confederacy as anything but a band of infidels, and as such, decided to attack the issue of slavery as an act of war, knowing that by doing so, he would both decide the issue of slavery and attack the South where it was most vulnerable.

Thus a series of events began to both free slaves and place a stranglehold on the South, still reliant on slavery to support their largely agricultural economy, events that resulted in the Emancipation Proclamation:



March 13, 1862: Lincoln forbids officers of the Union Army officers from returning fugitive slaves to their owners.

April 10, 1862: Congress decides that the federal government will compensate slave owners who free their slaves; this begins in Washington, D.C. On April 16, when slaveowners are compensated upon the release of their slaves.

June 19, 1862: Slavery is prohibited by Congress in United States territories. This decision opposes the 1857 ruling in the Dred Scott Case that stated Congress did not have the authority to regulate slavery in the United States.

January, 1862: Republican leader of the House of Representatives Thaddeus Stevens calls for total war against the perceived Southern rebellion, including the emancipation of slaves, in an attempt to destroy the Confederate economy.

July, 1862: Lincoln signs Congress’ “Second Confiscation Act” which liberates slaves held by southern “rebels.”

September 22, 1862: President Lincoln issues the first executive order of the Emancipation Proclamation, declaring freedom for all slaves in any state of the Confederacy that did return to the Union January 1, 1863.

January 1, 1863: President Lincoln issues the second executive order of the Emancipation Proclamation, which specifies that slaves in Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia were free.



Yet the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all slaves; exempted from the Proclamation were the contested states of Kentucky and Missouri, the soon-to-be West Virginia, and two Union slave states, Maryland and Delaware. It would be 1865, the conclusion of the war, before all slaves were emancipated in these states.

In fact, it would be 1865 before the majority of the slaves held in the states addressed by the Emancipation Proclamation were freed. Until the Confederacy was defeated, many of these slaves remained under the control of their masters.

While the Emancipation Proclamation did not immediately free all slaves, it did finally address the major schism between the North and the South – slavery. It was President Abraham Lincoln’s message to the Confederacy that slavery was indeed a matter of war, and that their short-lived rule would not outlast the Union.



 Mail this post

Technorati Tags: , ,

Copy Protected by Computer Tech Tips's Prevent Wordpress Copy & CopyProtect Blogs.